“Today testimony”
The followings are cases, events and cosmological
observations that are still mysterious for “The Big Bang Theory”. On the
contrary, those points are very important and becoming significant supporting
data for “Cloud & rain model” as the genuine Universe’s structure.
1. “Faster than
speed of light”. Actually, cosmological observation data we get that many sky
objects showing redshift z >1 has
presented strong indication for this case that certain objects can really flit
faster than the light speed. If we trust that redshift data (we do trust that)
then it’s all finish! A friend still gives alibi that on that cosmological
case, it is space that expand, while objects of matter are being carried away
by space. Wisdom speaking: “This is really controversial!”
We have to be smart enough to judge the above case.
Several other points should be included. Principally, there is only little
different between any travelling object and the space as travel media. Both
items (“object that travel” and “space as travel media”) contain space &
matter. So, on above case, it is confirmed that object of “compressed atom
structure matter” really can travel faster than the speed of light on cosmos as
travel media. See more explanation about this at page: “Introduction” of this
blog.
Nevertheless,
as “Wisdom speaking” has said: “That is really controversial!”, so the follow
case is absolutely an undisputed proof of certain object really flit faster
than the speed of light, “Mystery object in Starburst Galaxy M82 possible
micro-quasar”, (http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/2010/M82mystery/) and “Messier
82”, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_82).
2. “Huge LQC”.
See these articles: “Largest Quasar Group LQG discovered”, (http://truthdive.com/2013/01/13/largest-quasar-group-lqg-discovered.html),
“Thunderbolts Project – Huge Quasar Cluster refutes Big Bang Theory”,
(http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/02/thunderbolts-project-huge-quasar-cluster-refutes-big-bang-theory-2572364.html),
“Big Bang Theory Wrong Again - Lagest known quasar group or "object"
confirms Halton Arps predictions”,
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54WY3KHAwMw), “The Large Quasar Group, the
Largest Structure in the Universe”, (http://scitechdaily.com/the-large-quasar-group-the-largest-structure-in-the-universe/),
“Large quasar group is largest structure in the universe: scientists”,
(http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/science/130111/large-quasar-group-largest-structure-the-universe-scientists).
The articles above write about “Largest Quasar Group
(LQG)” ever found. “Cloud & rain model” warmly welcome this finding. This
structure is totally in harmony with “Cloud & rain model”. With “Cloud
& rain model”, it synchronizes with galaxies growth starting from stars
births. It also synchronizes with galaxies expanding like cloud over our planet
sky. So, no more comments!
Then, how about “The Big Bang theory”? Too many
controversies should appear in “Big Bang theory” about this finding, but they
are simply quiet. For them, Universe is still hiding many mysteries, while
mysteries are stuck with “The Big Bang theory” itself. So, why bother too much!
As long as “The Big Bang theory” is still in the hand then keep it tightly!
Never ever lose it whatever happens!
3. “Facts about
Dark matter”.
The follow texts are copy paste from: “Dark matter”,
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter).
“Dark matter is a type of matter hypothesized in
astronomy and cosmology to account for effects that appear to be the result of
mass where no such mass can be seen. Dark matter cannot be seen directly with
telescopes; evidently it neither emits nor absorbs light or other
electromagnetic radiation at any significant level. It is otherwise
hypothesized to simply be matter that is not reactant to light. Instead, the
existence and properties of dark matter are inferred from its gravitational
effects on visible matter, radiation, and the large-scale structure of the
universe”, and “Thus, dark matter is
estimated to constitute 84.5% of the total matter in the universe, while dark
energy plus dark matter constitute 95.1% of the total content of the universe”.
The above expressions harmonize with “Cloud & rain
model” expectation that dark matter is particles of “compressed atom structure
matter”, where we get situation; space = 0% and matter = 100 %. It also
synchronizes with “Cloud & rain model” expectation that dark matter
particles consistently fill the cosmos at extreme high concentration and
mobility. So, “Cloud & rain model” thanks for honest hypothesis about “dark
matter”.
“The Big Bang theory” has no idea about the correlation
between “The Big Bang theory” and dark matter, likewise “The Big Bang theory”
also has nothing idea at all about the correlation between “dark matter” and
CMBR.
In “Cloud and rain Model”, CMBR is simply “Dark matter”
that have got converted into ordinary matter wen they enter lower pressure
condition like arround planet’s atmosphere.
“The Big Bang theory” also can’t explain why dark matter
still consistently exist, without decreasing concentration and ammound at all
for the age of the Universe according its version.
4. “Galaxy
growth”. From collections of
cosmological observations (galaxies
observations) around Milky Way, it is clearly seen that Galaxies growth by: new
stars births & stars growth, new black holes constructions & black
holes growth, and mingling of neighbor galaxies.
One important sample of galaxies mingling is Andromeda
& Milky Way. And one good sample of growing galaxy that is harmonies with
“Cloud and rain model” is an article: ”Stellar motions in outer halo shed new
light on Milky Way evolution”
(http://phys.org/news/2013-02-stellar-motions-outer-halo-milky.html).
5. “Dying
Galaxies”. Please have a read of the
case: "Black Holes Create their Host Galaxies" --An Odd Quasar
Provides the Clues”,
(http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/01/black-holes-create-their-host-galaxies-a-strange-quasar-provides-clues.html).
See “The Big Bang theory” opinion about this case, as the follow copy paste:
“The answer may have been found to the question of whether a galaxy or its
black hole comes first -one of the most debated subjects in astrophysics today.
A recent study suggests that supermassive black holes can trigger the formation
of stars, thus 'building' their own host galaxies”.
They get trapped again. The above mentioned object is
HE0450-2958. It is at Caelum constellation
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HE0450-2958), at other side of Ursa Major &
Leo constellation on Galactic chart. This case harmonizes with “Cloud &
rain model” expectation that we will get reverse observation at that part of
Galactic chart (other side of “Universe’s nucleus”). The true event about that
case is that galaxy under severe condensation by massive dying stars that build
black hole intensively. Actually, HE0450-2958 is a dying galaxy.
6. “Expanding
Universe”. Please see & read: “Accelerating universe”,
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_universe).
Getting confused by “Expanding acceleration”, “The Big
Bang theory” hypothesizes a new case “dark energy”; see “Dark energy”,
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy).
Wow! At this case “Cloud & rain model” win again.
About the interpretation of “Expanding acceleration”, “The Big Bang theory”
must hardly hypothesize the case “dark energy”, while “Cloud & rain model”
has easily illustrated that as widely written in page “Harmony” of this blog.
The biggest blunder of “The Big Bang theory” came from
wrong interpretation of “macro pattern” of the Universe since the very
beginning. Then, when “The Big Bang theory” had successfully defeated “Einstein
Static theory” & “Steady State Universe”, the followers of the “Big Bang
theory” get more and more over confidence.
Well! It is just fine for the past!
Actually, if the interpretation of its “macro pattern” of
whatever case has been right or close enough to the right, we will get the
right answer about that case more precisely and more easily. If friends start
with wrong interpretation of the “macro pattern” of any case, then they will
get trapped easily. The over confidence of “The Big Bang theory” holders is
mainly because they think that they have the very sophisticated theory
“Einstein General Relativity Theory” with them. But we mustn’t easily forget
that “Einstein General Relativity” is only a mathematical equation. It is not a
simple physics law. Mathematical equation of “Einstein General Relativity” is a
product of processing of physics laws composite and attached parameters that
are involved on certain case which we want to interpret. One significant
sample; “Einstein General Relativity” has been successful to be applied at
“GPS” on our planet, because friends who use that equation fully master its
“macro pattern” and “complete parameters” in that case.
