“Introduction”
The real Universe structure is “Cloud & rain model”.
All cosmos observation from the oldest to the latest are always in
harmony with “Cloud & rain model”, while they are (many of the newest ones)
giving mysteries with “The Bing Theory”.
The old conclusion that “the Universe expanding” base on almost all
cosmos objects redshift (so it had defeated “Einstein Universe”, but saluted
Einstein’s General relativity) isn’t accepted anymore now, because lately, we
get many cosmos objects showing redshift with z value much greater than 1.
Any object moving with the speed “faster enough” than the light speed
(starting from around 1 to 2 times the light speed, depend on angle of vector
directions of the object and observer) will always indicate redshift,
regardless the object nearing or receding the observer. Why? That is because on
the above situation, the light of the object that arrives first to the observer
is always the light that originates from the nearer position of the moving
object.
But, there is complaint to the above statement! (and they surely get
controversial explanation with objects having redshift z >1 in cosmos). The
complaint comes from friends & comrades too tightly grasping “Einstein
statement” regarding his “General Relativity” that matter can’t move faster
than the speed of light. There must be a correction about this “matter movement
speed limit”. “Einstein’s statement” (or Einstein’s expectation) above is
almost correct. But, the true case is
any “ordinary matter” can’t move in travel media faster than the speed of
light.
When we talk about matter and space (travel media), there is one
important thing that we must never forget! In our general situation, we face
space and ordinary matter. Actually, in nature, both space and ordinary matter
that we generally mean is one the same thing. There is only little different
that is the concentration of “absolute space” & matter in it. “Absolute
space” is the situation where matter = 0 in the space (travel media). Both space (travel media) and ordinary
matter contain “absolute space” & matter. In the situation where we get
“absolute space” = 0% and matter = 100 %, this object isn’t an ordinary matter.
This object is a “compressed atom structure matter”. It happens when in atom of
ordinary matter, electrons become one with atom nucleus, in such a way so there
is no “absolute space” at all in that matter, or it gets “absolute space” = 0
%, while matter = 100 %. The “compressed
atom structure matter” is only exists at extremely high pressure &
temperature. Samples of “compressed atom structure matter” are black holes,
dark matter, star nuclei, planet nuclei and “Universe nucleus”.
So, when we talk about: ordinary matter can’t move in travel media faster
than the speed of light, it expresses that object with contains “absolute space”
& matter, where “absolute space” > 0%, can’t move faster than the speed
of light in travel media contains “absolute space” & matter. Any object
where “absolute space” = 0 % or object of “compressed atom structure matter”
undoubtedly can flit faster or much faster than speed of light. The logical
explanation about this is the objects containing “absolute space & matter”
travel on media containing “absolute space and matter” too. The larger
concentration of “absolute space” inside the moving object, the larger that moving
object gets resistance to travel through the travel media. Likewise, the larger
concentration of “matter” in the travel media, the larger any moving object
gets resistance to travel through. One simple sample of this case is that we
need to hammer the nail to move inside the wood.
One concrete & important sample of the object that travels faster
than the light speed can be read on the article: “Mystery object in Starburst
Galaxy M82 possible micro-quasar”,
(http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/2010/M82mystery/), as the follow ‘copy paste’:
“The galaxy, known as M82, is 10 million light years away and is a stellar production
line churning out new stars at a prodigious rate. However, many of these stars
die quickly in huge explosions, with a new supernova explosion occurring every
20 to 30 years. “The new object, which appeared in May 2009, has left us
scratching our heads – we’ve never seen anything quite like this before,” said
Dr Muxlow. “The object turned on very rapidly within a few days and shows no
sign of decaying in brightness over the first few months of its existence. The
new young supernova explosions that we were expecting to see in M82 brighten at
radio wavelengths over several weeks and then decay over several months, so
that explanation seems unlikely.” The plausibility of a supernova explanation
was further undermined when very accurate positional monitoring by the UK
network of radio telescopes, MERLIN, tentatively detected a change in position
for the object over the first 50 days. This was equivalent to an apparent
superluminal motion of over 4 times the speed of light. Such large apparent
velocities are not seen in supernova remnants and are usually only found with
relativistic jets ejected from accretion disks around massive black hole
systems.”
About this object can also be read at
article: “Messier 82”, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_82).
“The Big Bang theory” is still
gloriously flagging until now, mainly because it gets trapped in three cases
belows:
1.
Almost all sky objects indicate resdshift, while there was no indication
for the existence of Universe’s nucleus at the center. Remember; several
hundred years ago, our friends got trapped by simple watch that the sun
encircles the Earth.
2.
Since the very beginning, “The Big Bang theory” relies on “Einstein
General relativity equation.” By setting “cosmological constant” as needed
depending on any time progressive cosmic observation, it is assumed “The Big
Bang Theory” synchronizes with that equation.
But we should never forget one
significant point that “Einstein’s General Relativity” is only a mathematical
equation. They are not a simple physics law. Mathematical equation of “Einstein
General Relativity” is a product of processing of “physics laws composite” and
attached parameters that are involved on certain case which we want to
interpret.
Actually, when we want to apply certain
mathematical equation against one case or event, we must get the right
interpretation of its “macro pattern”. On cosmology about Universe’s structure,
“The Big Bang Theory” has missed the most significant point that is the
Universe having nucleus at center, and (respectfully) it has gravity and
atmosphere.
3.
“The Big Bang theory” gets trapped with “Einstein expectation” that
matter can’t travel faster than the speed of light.
